Search found 78 matches
- Mon Sep 29, 2025 9:34 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
@johu I tracked it down to Q5 being defective and replaced it.
All the other components look fine, and I’ll connect the BMS back to the battery.
Do you have any recommendations to avoid stressing or burning components on startup?
Would it make sense to disable balancing before power-up, or is ...
- Mon Sep 29, 2025 12:19 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
It shows continuity - it beeps.Jacobsmess wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 12:11 pm Ah of course, when shorted what shows on your multimeter? Im a little confused as my Q5 shows around 0.7v on both working and non-working boards...
- Mon Sep 29, 2025 12:04 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
@Mario How did you diagnose Q5? I have some possibly unrelated issues with my boards but looking for ways to test different components to identify issues.
Johu described this earlier... Measured source vs drain pin with multimeter in diode test mode... It should show about 0.5V if it's ok ...
- Mon Sep 29, 2025 10:20 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
@johu I tracked it down to Q5 being defective and replaced it.
All the other components look fine, and I’ll connect the BMS back to the battery.
Do you have any recommendations to avoid stressing or burning components on startup?
Would it make sense to disable balancing before power-up, or is ...
All the other components look fine, and I’ll connect the BMS back to the battery.
Do you have any recommendations to avoid stressing or burning components on startup?
Would it make sense to disable balancing before power-up, or is ...
- Wed Sep 17, 2025 8:39 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
errinfo=988 means it got a 988/8192 reading from the ADC despite all FETs should be turned off. So around 0.5V or so. Apparently a rather soft connection. Can you verify 0.5V on the ADC input?
Sorry, I pulled the boards out to check FETs but didn't get time to that yet. Can do it when I connect ...
- Tue Sep 16, 2025 11:25 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Reporting status of my BMSes...
I did capacitor patch on all boards and uploaded newest firmware on August 28th. First I powered BMSes without battery and it was ok.
Then I powered up with battery connected and all worked like a charm. Balancing about 1 mV per day.
On September 2nd I decided to ...
I did capacitor patch on all boards and uploaded newest firmware on August 28th. First I powered BMSes without battery and it was ok.
Then I powered up with battery connected and all worked like a charm. Balancing about 1 mV per day.
On September 2nd I decided to ...
- Tue Jul 08, 2025 11:42 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Argh... I wanted to skip that.johu wrote: ↑Tue Jul 08, 2025 10:48 am Yes you should and I very much recommend the "capacitor patch"
- Tue Jul 08, 2025 8:57 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Now where do we stand?
- Mario runs 96S with v2.2, how does that go?
Not much happened since last report. I've received new board to replace #4, but didn't run balancing after installing it, I just did readouts for test. I disconnected boards and after that I was getting car ready for the ...
- Mon Jul 07, 2025 10:02 pm
- Forum: Projects
- Topic: [DRIVING] BMW e39 + Siemens motor + Prius Gen3 OI - Yanoibe39 conversion
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10900
Re: [FIRST DRIVE] BMW e39 + Siemens motor + Prius Gen3 OI - Yanoibe39 conversion
I finally got my car to pass inspection and got license plates. It's now registered as electric with 45kW.
The car got weighted when inspected and there is 699 kg on the front axle and 792 kg on the rear.
That is total 1491 kg.
Before conversion it was total 1640, front: 860, rear 780.
So, about ...
The car got weighted when inspected and there is 699 kg on the front axle and 792 kg on the rear.
That is total 1491 kg.
Before conversion it was total 1640, front: 860, rear 780.
So, about ...
- Sun Feb 23, 2025 5:05 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
- Sun Feb 23, 2025 1:05 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
I've updated all boards to the latest firmware again CI #21.
Board #4 is slowly flashing and reporting opmode error and lasterr BALANCER_FAIL.
It also reports 0V on all channels.
balancer_failed.png
Turned off balancing for now on all boards as this reading affects total reading.
I think that ...
Board #4 is slowly flashing and reporting opmode error and lasterr BALANCER_FAIL.
It also reports 0V on all channels.
balancer_failed.png
Turned off balancing for now on all boards as this reading affects total reading.
I think that ...
- Sat Feb 22, 2025 10:57 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Why do you use different code for min and max? It's the same thing just on different bytes. So, code for min should return correct value for the max if you read from bytes 2 and 3.
- Fri Feb 21, 2025 4:38 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
CAN mapping for ISA shunt is working nicely after configured correctly.
Here is configuration for idc and power:
Here is configuration for idc and power:
- Fri Feb 21, 2025 10:33 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Ah yes, the newer firmwares have a POST (power-on self test) and apparently that fails. This is indicated by the slowly flashing LED. In "lasterr" you can see why.
On said module there is probably an issue with the i2c comms to the ADC. Of course I don't understand why it shows now. I have ...
- Fri Feb 21, 2025 1:40 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Few more days passed, and here’s the latest status...
Good news: Delta is dropping by about 1mV per day.
subvalues205247.png
I raised cell voltage from ~3.7V to ~3.9V and ignored delta changes in between. Now I’m keeping it between 3.85V and 3.92V to make it easier to track delta differences ...
Good news: Delta is dropping by about 1mV per day.
subvalues205247.png
I raised cell voltage from ~3.7V to ~3.9V and ignored delta changes in between. Now I’m keeping it between 3.85V and 3.92V to make it easier to track delta differences ...
- Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:27 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
- Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:16 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
What happened to 1.09 though? Looks like it was discharged too much? Also 2.00 is flickering. Is the connection good?
Could it be somehow related to the last and first series in the pack?
I managed to get screenshot with this behaviour on cells between boxes 0-1, and 4-5.
I can't catch it on ...
- Sun Feb 16, 2025 6:48 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
What happened to 1.09 though? Looks like it was discharged too much?
It's actually 1.08, and it has been the lowest cell since the first measurements. I manually charged it a bit earlier, but apparently not enough. The "hole" in the graph above 1.08 makes the difference look bigger than it ...
- Fri Feb 14, 2025 10:55 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Status update after 24h:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GGfthETUmseFeljjOBOEQ9nLlaD1npYz/view?usp=sharing
And here’s the chart for the last 2 days, after charging to cca 3860mV:
batt2day.png
I wanted to pull out balance states durations for each cell. Since I have detailed logs from BMS for ...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GGfthETUmseFeljjOBOEQ9nLlaD1npYz/view?usp=sharing
And here’s the chart for the last 2 days, after charging to cca 3860mV:
batt2day.png
I wanted to pull out balance states durations for each cell. Since I have detailed logs from BMS for ...
- Thu Feb 13, 2025 10:23 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Great visualization! Will be interesting to see how long it takes to even out the rest. I take it one box is 1mV?
Thanks. I'm still learning, but you can do amazing visualization with Grafana charts and loads of data for them.
It's not one box for 1mV, it really depends on the delta and with ...
- Wed Feb 12, 2025 11:51 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
Finally, I got all boards working… actually, they’ve been running fine for a few days now.
The issue with the last two channels on board #4 turned out to be bad solder joints on some of the replaced resistors. A second pair of hands and eyes caught it, and once fixed, everything started working. :D ...
The issue with the last two channels on board #4 turned out to be bad solder joints on some of the replaced resistors. A second pair of hands and eyes caught it, and once fixed, everything started working. :D ...
- Wed Jan 29, 2025 10:16 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
I don't know if it's because measuring in circuit... I just know how to put probes on the pins and read value.
Thanks, I will check 5V rail level...
- Wed Jan 29, 2025 9:40 am
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
- Tue Jan 28, 2025 7:36 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
I wanted to follow up on my last message...
I ordered and received the components and have now replaced all the resistors I previously identified as bad. The latest voltage readouts from all boards are available in the "0128_1800" sheet in this document:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d ...
I ordered and received the components and have now replaced all the resistors I previously identified as bad. The latest voltage readouts from all boards are available in the "0128_1800" sheet in this document:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d ...
- Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:06 pm
- Forum: Battery Managment (BMS)
- Topic: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
- Replies: 269
- Views: 109348
Re: Flying ADC 16 channel BMS 96S test
I've received the P- and N-channel MOSFETs and replaced all six components from my previous messages.
After the first attempt, I got these readings:
u0 1.15625
u1 0
u2 3894.46875
u3 3895.03125
u4 3894.46875
u5 3866.25
u6 3903.25
u7 3886.21875
u8 3902.6875
u9 3835.71875
u10 -177.34375
u11 403.46875 ...
After the first attempt, I got these readings:
u0 1.15625
u1 0
u2 3894.46875
u3 3895.03125
u4 3894.46875
u5 3866.25
u6 3903.25
u7 3886.21875
u8 3902.6875
u9 3835.71875
u10 -177.34375
u11 403.46875 ...