Improve documentation with help of AI

Introduction and miscellaneous that we haven't created categories for, yet
Post Reply
User avatar
uhi22
Posts: 649
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:20 pm
Location: Ingolstadt/Germany
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 429 times

Improve documentation with help of AI

Post by uhi22 »

As @jrbe proposed, we could try to improve the docu using AI. This thread is intended to discuss the possibilities and the results.
Any Idea welcome.
User avatar
johu
Site Admin
Posts: 5837
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:52 pm
Location: Kassel/Germany
Has thanked: 163 times
Been thanked: 1058 times
Contact:

Re: Improve documentation with help of AI

Post by johu »

Exciting!
What options do we have? Is there AI that generates formatted output, maybe even draws diagrams that we can put directly into the wiki?
Support R/D and forum on Patreon: https://patreon.com/openinverter - Subscribe on odysee: https://odysee.com/@openinverter:9
User avatar
mane2
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2023 6:32 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Improve documentation with help of AI

Post by mane2 »

Chat would be awesome. AI could be fed with the code and forum discussions, and you could just ask questions from it.
jrbe
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2023 3:17 pm
Location: CT, central shoreline, USA
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Improve documentation with help of AI

Post by jrbe »

Gemini (Google) claims to be able to do a lot. But it falls flat after you spend a bunch of time doing work & trying. It also forgets what you previously shared with it 5 minutes ago. Its multimodal for input and output (different communication formats like text, images, etc.) but tells you it can't do things it should be able to do, but then does what it said it couldn't. It also fails at outputting much data. Ive found it to be erratic, impressive, infuriating, and disappointing.

Chatgpt is decent and has in & out multimodal support. It can "see" & create images and modify those created images as you want. I think it's the best well rounded option.
Chatgpt has some impressive coding abilities, I'm unsure how the others are. It could be used to write the bulk of code and could also list and define the variables, how to use the code, etc. Open inverter being open source there's no worry of the code leaking into the world. Chat gpt4 is kind of lazy occasionally & inconsistently.

Claude is the sharpest ai that I've tried. It has multimodal input but text only output. It can do ASCII art but no image generation.
https://arstechnica.com/information-tec ... zz-online/

I don't think everyone will like the same one and I'm unsure of limitations in different countries.

I believe they all could or could be trained to format text to the wiki format as well as others. And they should be able to hop languages easily.

I think there's a lot of potential for ai to be extremely helpful here for documentation and more. We should be able to copy / paste large chunks of the relevant forum posts and have the ai clean it up into formatted instructions to paste into the wiki.
jrbe
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2023 3:17 pm
Location: CT, central shoreline, USA
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Improve documentation with help of AI

Post by jrbe »

Next questions, chat GPT answers:
How does someone add a chatGPT chat not bot to their website? Can it reference the wiki on the website or does it need to be updated manually as new info is entered into the wiki?
Chatgpt:
Adding a ChatGPT chatbot to a website typically involves embedding it using HTML code provided by the platform or service you're using. If you want the chatbot to reference a wiki on the website, you would need to integrate that functionality separately. Depending on the platform you're using for the chatbot and the wiki, you might be able to automate updates, but it would likely require some custom development work.
Are there ai chatbots available for media wiki sites? If there are options can you list them?
Chatgpt
Yes, there are AI chatbots available for integrating with MediaWiki sites to provide assistance and enhance user experience. Some options include:

1. **Dialogflow:** Dialogflow, by Google Cloud, offers a powerful platform for building conversational interfaces, including chatbots. It provides integration options for various platforms, including MediaWiki.

2. **Botpress:** Botpress is an open-source conversational AI platform that allows you to build, manage, and deploy chatbots. It offers integration capabilities with MediaWiki and provides a range of features for creating sophisticated bots.

3. **Rasa:** Rasa is another open-source conversational AI platform that enables you to build AI-powered chatbots. While it might require more technical expertise, it offers flexibility and customization options, including integration with MediaWiki.

4. **IBM Watson Assistant:** IBM Watson Assistant is a robust AI-powered chatbot platform that supports integration with various platforms, including MediaWiki. It provides tools for building, training, and deploying chatbots with natural language understanding capabilities.

These platforms offer different features and customization options, so you can choose the one that best fits your requirements and technical expertise.
Are the above all chatgpt ai?

ChatGPT
No, the options listed above (Dialogflow, Botpress, Rasa, IBM Watson Assistant) are not specifically ChatGPT AI. They are conversational AI platforms that offer various features for building chatbots, including natural language understanding and dialogue management capabilities. While ChatGPT is an AI language model developed by OpenAI, it is not specifically designed for building chatbots like the platforms mentioned above. However, you can integrate ChatGPT into chatbot applications to provide conversational capabilities powered by natural language processing.
Post Reply