barracuda816 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:30 pm
Oh no, what's happening with the charger (Dodge) ?
Short version: on Tuesday it was towed into the dealer for failure to start. It's still there.
Long version: There appears to be a significant issue with the Charger Daytona (and presumably the whole STLA Large platform) regarding the 12V system. Several owners, including myself, have had issues with the car refusing to start with a "service EV system" error. It often resolves itself by waiting a bit and trying again, and occasionally by charging the 12V. In the past few weeks its gotten noticeably worse. On Tuesday mine wouldn't start and none of the tricks worked.
According to a Mopar tech on the Daytona forum, what he has been told by Stellantis engineers is that, (caveat here that this in now 3rd hand info), basically when the 12V battery voltage drops even a little bit the DTC that it throws tells the car to open the HV contactors. Which obviously then prevents the DC-DC from charging the 12V battery. Which then causes a cascade of other errors.
If at first you don't succeed, buy a bigger hammer.
1940 Chevrolet w/ Tesla LDU - "Shocking Chevy" - Completed Hot Rod Drag Week 2023 and 2024
barracuda816 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 9:45 am
But hopefully an easy (and quick update fix for you.
So far its not looking that way. Stellantis seems to have the most bass-ackward system of communicating with the dealer tech's, and they also seem to not have an update ready for this issue.
I don't know if this is a result of legacy code/hardware, or some engineer convinced this was a smart idea, or just big-organization inertia, but they don't seem to have a real fix. Its also still there with no news other than "the tech is talking with Stellantis"
If at first you don't succeed, buy a bigger hammer.
1940 Chevrolet w/ Tesla LDU - "Shocking Chevy" - Completed Hot Rod Drag Week 2023 and 2024
Got the inverter swap done last night. Left the drive unit in the car and just dropped the suspension enough to pull the inverter out, which can be a bit of a pain but is less of a pain than dropping the whole drive unit.
Only had time for a quick drive down the street to make sure everything worked, hoping to do some tuning this week and maybe a track test next weekend.
If at first you don't succeed, buy a bigger hammer.
1940 Chevrolet w/ Tesla LDU - "Shocking Chevy" - Completed Hot Rod Drag Week 2023 and 2024
Paul, when you built this car did you weld the rear sub frame in or is it mounted on the rubber bushings? I was thinking about using your same suspension swap on some GMs with a 4-link. Thanks
dbc105 wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 11:20 pm
Paul, when you built this car did you weld the rear sub frame in or is it mounted on the rubber bushings? I was thinking about using your same suspension swap on some GMs with a 4-link. Thanks
The forward two bushings are in place, the middle point is bolted to the car's frame.
However, I don't recommend using this solution. The subframe prevents the drive unit from getting as high up in the car as it should be, leading to weird axle angles and the combination of a tall ride height and low hanging drive unit. Also, the GTO rear suspension is known to have camber issues (and no real adjustment) and I have had issues with that.
A better approach might be using the GTO hubs and trailing arms with custom mounts, rather than trying to use the subframe like I did.
If I was to build this car over again, I'd probably go with a de Dion style axle. In fact, I'm working on designing one for the next race car, which I'll be pairing with a parallel 4 link.
If at first you don't succeed, buy a bigger hammer.
1940 Chevrolet w/ Tesla LDU - "Shocking Chevy" - Completed Hot Rod Drag Week 2023 and 2024
I started out yesterday with Shocking Chevy nearly giving me a heart attack. I wanted to go test, but needed to charge first, so I plugged the car in a decided to work on other small things that needed fixing, like the dented rear corner and taillight, trunk seal, etc. Once it was charged, I got set up for tuning (and videoing the tuning), saved the existing parameter set, and went to leave to go to my test spot... and as soon as I engaged forward, it tripped the Overcurrent-that's-actually-the-Tesla-gate-drivers-throwing-a-fit error, which is when it throws overcurrent and giving a start signal again doesn't clear it. So, despite having driven into the garage last weekend, I assumed something was up with the inverter. I opened up the case, plugged the low voltage harness back in, powered up, and no error lights. Hmmm time for danger - I connected the HV without the case on, and powered up the inverter, expecting to see an error light on a gate driver and... no errors. I gave it throttle, and it spun. Weird. I put it back together, half expecting it would not start, but it started fine several times, and I have no clue what cause the original error.
So I proceeded to my testing spot, a semi-private-ish access road that's straight and away from traffic and of questionable ownership (created when a new highway was built to provide access to a couple of farm fields, not clear if the state or the farms own it) and began testing. Now for context, my old "street" tune did a 3.47sec 0-60mph pull at this spot, according to my Speedhut GPS speedometer. I began by dropping fweak to where it was in best prior race tune, and then began raising fslipmax, from 2.6xx all the way to 3.3, at which point the battery had drained enough (about 85% indicated, 75% real world) that I wanted to stop and try this current tune again at full battery strength (the Volt batteries have a linear decay) to make sure nothing trips. Best time of the day 2.64sec 0-60mph.
I had been planning all week that I would go to a test-and-tune at Rockingham Dragway today, but it's currently pouring rain, so that'll have to wait. I really need to do some track testing to have the incrementals and see what these changes are doing at various points in a run. Also looking back at the video from outside the car, I definitely have some more suspension tuning to do.
Video coming, hopefully next by next weekend.
If at first you don't succeed, buy a bigger hammer.
1940 Chevrolet w/ Tesla LDU - "Shocking Chevy" - Completed Hot Rod Drag Week 2023 and 2024
johu wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 3:57 pm
That is insane! Is it sport inverter all the way now?
Basically yes. Its all Sport phases, but the current sensors and a few other small bits are actually from the Base inverter because a) I didn't want to dig through bins to find the ones off the Sport inverter, and b) the base version appears to be a later revision. The casing is also originally a Sport casing, but it has the rotor from the Base version because of the stripped shaft on the Sport one, and it appears they were the same anyways. So the parts that make a Sport LDU into a Sport LDU (power stages) are all Sport now. The rest is a mixed bag.
If at first you don't succeed, buy a bigger hammer.
1940 Chevrolet w/ Tesla LDU - "Shocking Chevy" - Completed Hot Rod Drag Week 2023 and 2024
Wanted to test this weekend but the damn inverter is being weird again. Of course, just a couple weeks before the first event I've committed to this year. Started a thread about it here: viewtopic.php?p=83003#p83003
If anyone has ideas, I'd appreciate it.
If at first you don't succeed, buy a bigger hammer.
1940 Chevrolet w/ Tesla LDU - "Shocking Chevy" - Completed Hot Rod Drag Week 2023 and 2024
P.S.Mangelsdorf wrote: ↑Tue May 06, 2025 12:11 pm
The forward two bushings are in place, the middle point is bolted to the car's frame.
However, I don't recommend using this solution. The subframe prevents the drive unit from getting as high up in the car as it should be, leading to weird axle angles and the combination of a tall ride height and low hanging drive unit. Also, the GTO rear suspension is known to have camber issues (and no real adjustment) and I have had issues with that.
A better approach might be using the GTO hubs and trailing arms with custom mounts, rather than trying to use the subframe like I did.
If I was to build this car over again, I'd probably go with a de Dion style axle. In fact, I'm working on designing one for the next race car, which I'll be pairing with a parallel 4 link.
Thanks Paul, glad you expanded on that because I would not have know to ask about subframe blocking the motor. I really like the DeDion axle idea, I 1st saw that with Jonny 5 and then on This Old Jalopy but he ran into interference with the car frame rails so that is to be considered there. The 4 link sounds like a good idea, I know a street rod builder that uses those kits and he really likes it, universal and tunable. Looking forward to seeing the next build.