MLBevo Charger- 11kw & 22kw Info

[tom91]

I will review the code when I get a chance and approve it.

Ran into some issues when testing, but it does initiate a charge.

So you have it running on an ZombieVerter with other components connected?

[evMacGyver]

I stripped out all of the UDS stuff for now, Leaving that for the CAN-Bridge...
It should have a pretty good basis for CCS charging; So if you happen to have your system wired up with the DC Bus connections, I'd be interested to see if you can play around with the code to get it to work.

Nice work! I'll set up table test with zombie and connect charger to the battery. I also have pyPLC EVSE for simulating CCS charge if it helps. But I don't have correct charging socket with plug and cover locks, so I need to wait for UDS coding stuff. If you add it inside charger module, just like Foccci ConfigCan function, I could try it even there is no parameter for it.

[tom91]

If you add it inside charger module, just like Foccci ConfigCan function, I could try it even there is no parameter for it.

Not that simple. Will require quite a bit of testing to get things running just right. Need the right flow of requests and responses.

Also need to ensure it does not interfere with other parts of Zombie code

[Mitchy]

I will review the code when I get a chance and approve it.



So you have it running on an ZombieVerter with other components connected?

Bench tested with the most recent vehicle_testing branch.
I did upload it with the Simulate function still active , so may be best to reject it and I'll sync it up once modelfan reports back.
Tried to do a online edit once I realized, then a pull request via vscode; somehow got out of sync, so gave up for the night on it.

There's still some improvement to be had, I'm sending more msgs than absolutely required. But it's a good first step to get more testing done.

The PDK shifter and VAG_Utils code is being used in my build; the MQB function is being used for my vehicle CAN spoofing; so both functions of the Utils is proven.

[tom91]

I did upload it with the Simulate function still active , so may be best to reject it and I'll sync it up once modelfan reports back.

I think you could amend it, you can always get your own Branch to the state you want and do a new request. Then I will close the old one and accept+run checks on the new one.

Then we can merge it into vehicle testing and have others also try it.

It is great progress